Sunday, September 07, 2008

Vanity publishing – know the realities and grab the Maalox

“I’ve decided to self-publish my book.”


My heart always sinks a degree when an author tells me this because it’s never a joyous decision, but one of defeat and resignation. They got tired of wading through countless submissions and subsequent rejections and decided they’d rather “settle” than either shelve the story or continue trying. The “why’s” don’t really matter. But what does matter is the idea that vanity presses insist their services are a win-win deal.


In the past several days I’ve seen repeated mention of how the vanity plan is a win-win deal, and I always wonder what kind of tarragon they’re smoking. Sure, on the surface it sounds great. What? I can see my book in print? I can be a published author? Heck yeah, where do I sign? But to me, this win-win mantra is saying, “Your writing sucks too much to be published by a real publisher and no one will publish you. But we will.”


Ok, maybe that’s unusually harsh, and I temper that opinion by recognizing there are many reasons why authors choose this avenue, but ON AVERAGE authors choose this due to excessive rejections. Remember, this is pay to play, and there is no litmus test for talent or marketability other than the size of your checkbook.


Be that as it may, authors are still going to go this route, so they should at least be aware of the concerns:


Quality – this is a business of quantity not quality, and when you have thousands of authors clamoring for their books, you need to get them out the door asap. And it shows. I’ve seen books that made me wince. The cover art was ineffective run-of-the-mill clip art, and the interior design consisted of little more than Spell Check. Interior design is an art that requires the skills of someone who knows what they’re doing. Books haven’t even been properly formatted, but are merely put into pdf format and zapped off to the printer.


Cohesiveness – It’s a fact that employees come and go. This happens with publishing houses as well. But I’ve talked to vanity authors who worked, not with an editor, but an account manager. An. Account. Manager. This, alone, should tip anyone off to the priorities of this business plan. Their focus is on moving files through the maze of production, and has nothing to do with quality or editing. I’ve talked to other authors who worked with “editors,” but in reality, they were nothing more than account managers as well. Slog the manuscript through Spell Check, move it down line and out the door.


What are the qualifications of an account manager or “editor”? And what happens when one leaves? Presumably their files are spread out to other account managers. I’ve talked with authors whose books fell through the cracks when their account managers left. Oftentimes they had no idea they’d been orphaned until they asked what was going on with their books. Month, two-month-long delays are not unusual.


“A real publisher will pick it up” – Oboy, I see this all the time, and nothing could be more false. Read my lips: vanity books do not open doors to real publishers. It’s just the opposite. The industry doesn’t view vanity books as a legitimate publishing credit because there is no rejection threshold other than the size of the author’s checkbook. This is seen as a route for the impatient and/or hobbyist writers – not serious writers. A vanity published book is akin to driving a brand new car off the lot. The minute that car hits the street, it depreciates and looses value. With all the fabulous, unpublished works out there, that is where we focus our attention.


Sales, distribution – This is one of the biggest heartaches I see. Authors find out too late that their books will never be distributed to store shelves, there will be no sales teams pitching their books. Virtually every sale has to originate from the author without benefit from any help from the vanity press. Unless the author is a public speaker and can garner sales from the back of the room, selling is exhausting work and hideously expensive.


Ultimate risk – Getting back to this win-win, ‘we’re a collaborative team,’ ‘we’re giving authors the chance they deserve’ scenario that vanity presses espouse, authors must understand who, in reality, has the ultimate risk. Benevolence is lovely, but it doesn’t sell books. Remember, authors pay to play. The more services a publisher offers, the more the package costs. Obviously, the profit margin is built into those prices, so there is no risk. Remember that all sales responsibilities are on the author’s shoulders, so what happens if the book doesn’t sell? Since the author shelled out big money, I'm willing to bet the vanity press isn't taking a hit. Not at those prices.


In the end, I realize there will still be a large community who, after seeing all the negatives, will still take their chances because their desire to be see their work between covers is stronger. And this is what the vanity presses are banking on. But, at least, those authors can go into this brave new world with their eyes wide open.

12 books were read:

Kelley said...

Well, that's it exactly-the desire to see their work between covers.

That's the difference between those who go vanity and those who persevere at the traditional publication route. A difference in desire/s.

I suspect for some of us who decide not to pay to be published by a vanity press, it's not enough to just see our work between covers. We want to earn it.(I also suspect it probably has something to do with my word choice "earn.") Paying to have my book published wouldn't fulfill my ultimate desires.

But. Different goals, different desires, different choices. Neither right nor wrong. But for those who do decide to go the vanity route-thank you. This is an informative and helpful post...

John Quirk said...

Nice post, Lynn. It would be interesting to hear your thoughts on the differences between the typical vanity publishing and those authors who go the self-publishing route, i.e. who look on it as a business and deal with the editing, proof-reading, layout, cover design etc, and then get competitive quotes from printers before sending it to be printed, rather than to a vanity publisher, who looks after everything for them.

I think there is a lot of confusion between the two avenues (and misinformation out there), although ultimately the author is spending his/her own money to see their book on shelves.

Cheers
JQ

Lynn Price said...

There’s a world of difference between going with a vanity press and true self publishing. That’s why I always ask for clarification. For the true self pubbed author, this is a full time job. They assume all costs for production, print runs, sales, promotion, distribution, and fulfillment. It’s not for the faint of heart, and no one should go into this blindly.

They have to take a crash course in the publishing business, how books are bought and sold, and have a firm grasp on the marketplace and their readership. Sadly, most don’t, and lots of big money goes down the drain because they have no idea how encompassing, competitive, and tough the literary world is. This is not a case of “if you write it, they will come.”

Conversely, I’ve seen many terrific self-pubbed books (not vanity books) that have sold very well and enjoyed wonderful distribution, and I take my hat off to those who took all the necessary steps to ensure their success.

Jeff said...

Are there even vanity publishers who operate like this anymore? I can't imagine why they should still be in business with so many other, better self-publishing options.

Also, self-publishing isn't so much about huge expensive print runs, either, although I imagine there are people out there still doing this. I don't know why anyone would, though, as there are excellent POD options at places like Lulu.com. Last year when I created a chapbook of stories published on my ezine, SouthernGothic.org, I used Cafepress to publish it. There were no upfront costs in my case, because I only sell the book through Cafepress and on the SouthernGothic website. But there is some cost if you plan to have your book sold in bookstores and Amazon, as you have to get an ISBN, which costs money, but nothing like the cost of a big print run. And because of the cost per book, it isn't really cost effective to try to sell them in bookstores.

The thing is though, self-published books and POD books don't always mean unedited, rejected by everyone dreck written by an impatient, uncommitted author. Sure, that prejudice still exists and probably will exist as long as there are still big publishing houses. But in some cases, the only difference IS the prejudice.

DOT said...

You won't like me for saying this, but one shelves an object or topic, not shelf - that is the noun. Sorry to be so picky!

I have heard so many strong arguments against vanity publishing and POD that I am convinced. However, I would like some historical perspective, as there was a moment, I am sure though uncertain, when publishing switched from being solely at the arbitration of the author over the publisher, Or, perhaps, it was vice versa?

ICQB said...

I am giving up on my writing. I am not going the self publishing or vanity press route. I know that those avenues are dead ends.

I've been trying to get someone interested in my ya novel. I took a year off from my life to write it (because I wanted to focus on it). Then I jumped back into my life along with critique groups, writing groups, conferences and revised, revised, revised. I sent out lots of queries. I never stopped trying to better my query letter, trying to get feedback on my novel, trying to learn the ins and outs of the publishing industry.

I waited. And waited. And waited.

I received rejections. Slowly. Sometimes months after a query.

Once I got a request for a full. I sent it. And waited. And waited. You're not supposed to contact the agent because they are soooo busy. I waited some more. Three months later I recieved a rejection.

Oh my gosh! I got a request for a partial! Almost overnight! I sent it. Oh my gosh! A reply, again almost overnight! With comments all over the partial and a request to revise and resubmit.

I revised. Which takes time. I resubmitted. And waited. And waited. Three months have gone by. I sent a polite, "just wondering if you've had the chance to take a look," note. Nothing. Still waiting.

Writing is a huge investment. Of time. Of psyche. Of soul. And it's hard to judge if you're any good, because no one will tell you to your face if you stink, and can you really believe the people who say they like what you've written?

I'm waiting (and waiting) for this final rejection. As soon as I get it, I'm giving my novel away for free and walking away from writing. I have a website up and waiting to go.

I could solier on and continue to write - but why? Why invest so much time and so much of myself into something that takes years to find out if it's publishable or not?

I can see why many people take the POD and self publishing routes - out of frustration - out of longing for SOME kind of validation.

I'm not playing the waiting game anymore. It's time for me to realize that I probably don't have what it takes, and I'm not going to invest huge portions of my life in the delusion anymore.

If just one person stumbles on my site once it's made public and reads or downloads my story and likes it - that will mean a great deal to me. That's all I'm looking for now.

I think that's how many of the people who go the vanity publishing route feel.

Lynn Price said...

self-published books and POD books don't always mean unedited, rejected by everyone dreck written by an impatient, uncommitted author.
Keep in mind that I said "on average." There are exceptions to everything.

but one shelves an object or topic, not shelf
Yes, this I know. However, I overlooked it when I wrote the piece at 2 am.

However, I would like some historical perspective, as there was a moment, I am sure though uncertain, when publishing switched from being solely at the arbitration of the author over the publisher, Or, perhaps, it was vice versa?
The changes came about with the advent of digital printing. What made for easy short print runs - which many of us use for our ARCs - gave way to the business plan of POD and vanity. It was, and still is, extremely profitable with little risk.

The longer these companies are around, the more convincing they have to be in order to gain new authors, and that's why we hear the "giving you the chance you deserve/win-win/collaborative" mantra. They make it appear as though author and printer are in it together, and nothing could be further from the truth.

I think that's how many of the people who go the vanity publishing route feel.
Icqb, my heart goes out to you. I can feel your hurt in every word. I don't mean to sound unduly harsh, but writing is like any other art form. I've know painters who had shows and never sold a single painting. That was the public's way of saying, "sorry, we don't like your work. Don't quit your day job."

Life is tough, and none of us are guaranteed success. So while I understand how authors come to this low point in their lives and go with vanity presses, I can't help but consider that maybe those books don't belong in print in the first place. I see vanity presses as prolonging the inevitable and adding insult to injury by lightning the author's checkbook along the way. Again, I'm speaking ON AVERAGE. All the best to you.

Johans Watkins said...

I feel Icqb's pain too. I've been through some of the same.


Lynn, thanks for the reality check. your comments are refreshing.

Judy said...

I always enjoy your clarifications on POD, versus vanity, versus self publishing, Lynn. And these responses are interesting and reflect what a lot of us go through as writers trying to share our work. I have to say, though, that just because a person's work is rejected over and over again does not mean that it isn't good enough to be out there. I just had an agent tell me that while I am a lovely writer she is rejecting my manuscript for reasons other than the quality of the story. We have to keep in mind that agents and commercial publishers are looking at what they think they can sell, and that often is separate from the quality of your work. I have writer friends who have been in the business a long time, and it's sad to hear the stories of truly great writers with commercial track records who are being pushed out or just not pushed forward the way they ought to be because of what th industry thinks is "commercial enough." Frankly, it's discouraging. When I am feeling my lowest, I think that a lot of truly gifted writers probably won't ever be published.

Lynn Price said...

Judy, this is why I keep clarifying everything by saying ON AVERAGE. I agree that rejections don’t necessarily reflect a manuscript’s quality, and maybe it hasn’t found the right home. However, I have to temper that by saying hundreds of rejections more than likely mean something is wrong with the work. After all, can that many agents/editors be wrong? Ostensibly, that manuscript has gone through the top of the line, and all of them believed they couldn’t sell it. These opinions are based on their years of experience.

agents and commercial publishers are looking at what they think they can sell, and that often is separate from the quality of your work.

Well, now we’re talking a chicken vs. the egg situation because we have to quantify what “great writing” is. Ideally, great writing sells, which we know that isn’t the case. I’ve seen fabulous writing that I had to reject because I knew I couldn’t sell it. Great stories, on the other hand, do sell, and that’s what we’re looking for. Publishers and agents shoulder the blame all the time, and I’m not saying who is right in this scenario. But let's not forget that we’re slaves to what the market will by because those sales are what keep us in business.

If authors go with a vanity press, all aspects of sales and promotion fall on their shoulders AND they are competing with trade-published books that the industry believes are marketable. With all the competition, the vanity press author doesn’t stand a chance against the shuffle, and this is the gist of my post.

Judy said...

I appreciate your qualification, Lynn. I was just pointing out something that can be hard to remember when you're on the receiving end of all the rejections. And I agree with you wholeheartedly--one must pay attention to the rejections. For example, I know the ms of mine has been rejected enough to tell me there are flaws in it, and I know where they are. I am just too creatively drained to fix them right now. So, I turn my attention to something else and come back to that project another time.

Lynn Price said...

Yes, Judy, of course, you're right...in the heat of rejections, it's achingly hard to remember all the realities. That's why I discuss these things - to serve as a reminder during those tough times. I also understand being drained over a project. Been there, done that. And you're infinitely wise to put it away for a while. You both need a break from each other. If it's the story I'm thinking of, I do hope you return to it with fresh eyes because the premise is fabulous.